IP-API vs IPGeolocation
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
IP-API compared with IPGeolocation
| Detail | IP-API | IPGeolocation |
|---|
| What it does | Fast, accurate, reliable
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2018
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - IP address geolocation lookup
- Multiple response formats (JSON, XML, CSV, Newline, PHP)
- No API key required for free endpoint
- DNS API
- Real-time database updates
| - IP geolocation with city-level accuracy
- Threat score and security detection
- Downloadable IP intelligence databases
- ASN and network intelligence
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No API key or registration required for free use
- Sub-50 millisecond response times globally
- Serves over 1 billion requests per day
- Established reliability since 2012
| - Unified endpoint for complete IP intelligence including geolocation, timezone, ASN, organization, and security signals
- Threat score with provider names and confidence levels instead of boolean flags
- Residential proxy detection with provider identification and last-seen dates
- Global infrastructure with 99.99% uptime SLA
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 77 ● no change since last check | 70 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 31 | 32 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 49 | 45 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 3110 | 1113 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to IP-API More alternatives to IPGeolocation